Featured today on takingchildrenseriously.com:
Philosophical issues

“Is it necessary to reject authority?”

A philosophical enquiry anecdote taking the children and the free world seriously

“Coercion is irrational?”

Educational theory: science or philosophy?

“Why not argue for Taking Children Seriously in terms of rights?”

A philosophical discussion about whether problems are solvable

“How can I drop the anti-rational part of my mind that interferes with me taking my children seriously?”

“Is the purpose of taking children seriously to avoid the harm coercion would do?”

What is Taking Children Seriously?

“Isn’t taking children seriously a risky experiment with children? Is there any evidence that it works? Has it been studied?”

“Children’s welfare secondary to a dogmatic ideology?”

An Objectivist’s assessment of Karl Popper

Why epistemology matters for parents

Is Taking Children Seriously revolutionary?

What do you mean by ‘fallible’?

Taking Children Seriously and fallibilism

Fallibilism is not self-contradictory

“What about instilling values like freedom, fallibilism and the idea of taking children seriously?”

Fallibilism as a way of being and acting

What constitutes taking children seriously is conjectural

There is no reliable way to tell whether what we think is true is actually true

A talk given at the Oxford Karl Popper Society

For more articles, see the FAQ or one of the other posts on the site. Feel like writing an article yourself?